There is an old adage "To live by the sword will die by the sword".
Cash kills if too much of it especially begotten illegally like the billions by the Cash King. He has to enjoy crazily much of it fast because he cannot outlive that mountainous amount of cash. The laws of nature and society will catch with him, seeing no way out mental derangement or even death is the final edict.
(extracted from Fudzail)
10 December 2016
Astonishingly,
Malaysia has a sitting Prime Minister who has now been forced to admit that he
received tens of millions of ringgit into his private accounts out of the KWAP
civil service pension fund.
It is known
that he sacked the previous Attorney General, who had drafted charges over
this theft and then appointed the new one, who immediately ‘cleared’ him,
despite open objections by the MACC.
Excuse was
PM didn’t know!
Having
first denied Najib had taken the money, AG Apandi later revised his position
and gave the explanation that the Prime Minister had not realised where the
money had come from.
Najib had
told him that he’d thought the money had come from the generous anonymous
‘donation’ from ‘somewhere in the Middle East’, which the Prime Minister claims
he received (the FBI say they have traced every cent of that money back to the
development fund 1MDB).
Nevertheless,
Najib has not been required to pay the money back to KWAP, which was originally
‘borrowed’ by the 1MDB subsidiary SRC International. The Prime Minister has
explained that he only spent it on CSR (corporate and social responsibility)
matters on behalf of 1MDB.
Yet various
payments already identified were in fact made to builders, jewellers, luxury
goods providers and anti-aging
specialists.
Remaining
payments must be made public
Since the
money received by the Prime Minister has now been confirmed as public money,
paid in by civil servants to sustain their pensions, there can be no longer any
excuse not to account for each and every one of these ‘corporate and social
responsibility’ expenditures, most of which remain hidden.
A document
waved by Apandi at his press conference in which he cleared the Prime Minister
showed that 17 persons had received cash from these accounts. Unless we
hear who these persons were, how much they received and for what purpose,
people are absolutely entitled to assume they were bribes (using their own stolen
savings).
17
‘recipients’ (people paid), according to Apandi’s own document
RM10
million paid February 10th 2015
Likewise,
consider the highly coincidental and (until a proper explanation is given)
highly suspicious receipt of RM10 million placed into Najib’s account on the
significant date of 10th February 2015.
This
payment was amongst the first to be identified by
both Sarawak Report and the Wall Street Journal when they exploded the scandal
of the PM’s accounts in March.
How the money
flowed, according to MACC investigations
February
10th 2015 was none other than the historic day that five Federal Court judges
opted to imprison the opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim on charges of sodomy –
charges of which he had been originally acquitted after a lengthy trial.
It is now
public knowledge that these accusations against Anwar had first seen the light
of day when they were discussed by none other than Najib himself and the
alleged victim, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, just days before that young man
made his police report.
As a
temporary worker for Anwar, the former BN supporting student activist had come
to Najib’s house to discuss the allegations, together with the prosecutor
Shafee Abdullah, as Najib has now finally admitted (after first lying that the
conversation had not taken place).
After that
initial meeting, sources have told Sarawak Report that Najib’s wife Rosmah
called round friends and told them “we have got him!”, meaning Anwar.
Najib’s
key legal consultant, Shafee Abdullah. He was officially paid peanuts to
conduct the trial…. so did any extra money find its way from the millions paid
to Najib through SRC? Only publication of these payments can lay to rest the
rumours.
However,
after a lengthy trial Anwar had in fact been acquitted in the High Court, where
the original judge dismissed the case owing to lack of evidence.
It was only
after the prosecution astonishingly appealed that acquittal (violating the
principle of double-jeopardy) that a ‘guilty’ verdict was finally achieved.
The Federal
Court upheld that guilty verdict on February 10th, after Shafee was brought in
as a special private prosecutor – again in violation of normal proper procedure.
Shafee (who acts as Najib’s lawyer in every delicate situation) had argued that
the proposed prison sentence be increased from 5 years to 20, which was in the
end rejected.
The five
judges are said to have walked into the court that day with two alternative
judgements prepared: one finding the opposition leader guilty and the other not
guilty.
It is for
such reasons that Najib must explain and prove exactly what the RM10 million he
received into his account that day was spent on; because the whole world is
otherwise entitled to make a simple division and put two and two together.
For the
sake of the honour of his appeal court judges, Najib must account for that cash
and dispel the growing rumour and suspicion engendered by the simple sum and
coincidental date.
Another
RM32 m ‘CSR’ payments hit Najib’s accounts at the end of December 2014…. what
were they spent on?
No comments:
Post a Comment